Method
A verification method, not an intuition.
Adamly audits precise claims from a defined scope, a reviewable body of evidence and a motivated decision.
The product is not the surface. The product is the discipline behind the public record.
Scope first
Adamly verifies a scope. Never an abstraction.
A scope can be a single asset, a set of approved deliverables, a shoot, a campaign or a defined visual workflow.
Every review starts by defining:
- What is covered
- What is not covered
- Which claims are being requested
- Which publication mode is expected
Evidence
A decision is only as strong as the evidence it can connect to the claim.
The exact checklist changes with the claim, but the logic stays the same: evidence must be traceable to the verified scope.
Typical evidence can include source files, capture metadata, production documents, call sheets, model releases, consent records, contracts, delivery references and supporting declarations.
What is not enough
A self-declaration alone is not credible proof.
Adamly does not rely on a single signal, a detector score in isolation or an export file detached from its context.
A decision must be supported by a coherent body of evidence. That is why scope, context and exclusions matter as much as the final asset itself.
Review
Review means connecting pieces to a public statement.
Adamly does not issue a broad philosophical verdict. It decides whether a precise public claim can be responsibly supported.
Possible outcomes:
- Verified
- Verified with limitations
- Insufficient evidence
- Not verified
Validity
A verification is not eternal.
Every record should carry issuance, validity and archive logic. Otherwise even a true claim becomes vague over time.
A claim can also be amended, suspended or withdrawn if the scope changes or new material evidence appears.
Public record
The method becomes visible in the public record.
If the verification is granted, Adamly publishes a readable verification page with the scope, claims, wording, dates, exclusions and challenge path.